On-demand — Method validation for sport medicine and orthopedics teams

About this Webinar

Across multiple cohorts, patient selection criteria deserve closer scrutiny, with meaningful differences between subgroups. Longitudinal data show that variability between operators remains a key limitation, as discussed in the accompanying commentary.

In routine practice, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, although confirmatory data are still limited. According to consensus recommendations, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, pending validation in prospective studies. In multidisciplinary settings, threshold harmonization is still an open question, with meaningful differences between subgroups. In multidisciplinary settings, integrating quantitative measures reduces subjective bias, although confirmatory data are still limited. Emerging evidence indicates that training and accreditation are decisive for reproducibility, and this trend is expected to continue.