Case-based review of diagnostic imaging workflows in obstetrics and gynecology

About this Webinar

In multidisciplinary settings, training and accreditation are decisive for reproducibility, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. In routine practice, pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, pending validation in prospective studies. According to consensus recommendations, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, although confirmatory data are still limited. In multidisciplinary settings, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, which has direct implications for daily practice.

In multidisciplinary settings, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, particularly in resource-constrained settings. According to consensus recommendations, threshold harmonization is still an open question, which has direct implications for daily practice.