Live webinar: sample preparation in nursing

About this Webinar

When protocols are compared, digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, which has direct implications for daily practice. According to consensus recommendations, threshold harmonization is still an open question, although confirmatory data are still limited. In routine practice, cost considerations continue to shape adoption in smaller units, particularly in resource-constrained settings. In routine practice, patient selection criteria deserve closer scrutiny, which has direct implications for daily practice. Contrary to earlier assumptions, digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, a finding echoed by several independent groups.

Emerging evidence indicates that training and accreditation are decisive for reproducibility, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Emerging evidence indicates that patient selection criteria deserve closer scrutiny, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. In multidisciplinary settings, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, with meaningful differences between subgroups. In routine practice, real-world registries complement randomized trial evidence, and this trend is expected to continue. Contrary to earlier assumptions, pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, and this trend is expected to continue.