Ask the experts: treatment adherence in everyday endocrinology

About this Webinar

Recent studies suggest that digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, which has direct implications for daily practice. Across multiple cohorts, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, although confirmatory data are still limited. When protocols are compared, integrating quantitative measures reduces subjective bias, although confirmatory data are still limited. In routine practice, real-world registries complement randomized trial evidence, pending validation in prospective studies.