Live webinar: method validation in cardiovascular disease

About this Webinar

According to consensus recommendations, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. According to consensus recommendations, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, although confirmatory data are still limited.

Emerging evidence indicates that patient selection criteria deserve closer scrutiny, with meaningful differences between subgroups. Recent studies suggest that training and accreditation are decisive for reproducibility, which has direct implications for daily practice. Recent studies suggest that cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, particularly in resource-constrained settings. From a workflow perspective, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, although confirmatory data are still limited.