Masterclass: high-throughput screening from a allergy and immunology perspective

About this Webinar

In multidisciplinary settings, digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, a finding echoed by several independent groups. From a workflow perspective, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, with meaningful differences between subgroups. Recent studies suggest that pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, although confirmatory data are still limited.

Longitudinal data show that cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, and this trend is expected to continue. Emerging evidence indicates that cost considerations continue to shape adoption in smaller units, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. Longitudinal data show that threshold harmonization is still an open question, with meaningful differences between subgroups. Across multiple cohorts, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, which has direct implications for daily practice. Contrary to earlier assumptions, pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, a finding echoed by several independent groups.