Visual guide to treatment adherence in nursing

In routine practice, training and accreditation are decisive for reproducibility, with meaningful differences between subgroups. From a workflow perspective, cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, pending validation in prospective studies. When protocols are compared, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, and this trend is expected to continue. Recent studies suggest that cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, which has direct implications for daily practice.

In routine practice, digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, although confirmatory data are still limited. Emerging evidence indicates that variability between operators remains a key limitation, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. Recent studies suggest that digital tooling shortens time-to-decision considerably, as discussed in the accompanying commentary.

In multidisciplinary settings, threshold harmonization is still an open question, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. From a workflow perspective, cost considerations continue to shape adoption in smaller units, pending validation in prospective studies.