At a glance: diagnostic imaging workflows in hematology

About this Infographic

Across multiple cohorts, cost considerations continue to shape adoption in smaller units, although confirmatory data are still limited. In multidisciplinary settings, variability between operators remains a key limitation, which has direct implications for daily practice. In multidisciplinary settings, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, and this trend is expected to continue. According to consensus recommendations, pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Across multiple cohorts, pre-analytical factors account for a large share of observed variance, a finding echoed by several independent groups.

In routine practice, threshold harmonization is still an open question, as discussed in the accompanying commentary. According to consensus recommendations, standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, which has direct implications for daily practice. Recent studies suggest that standardized reporting improves comparability between centers, as discussed in the accompanying commentary.

Longitudinal data show that cross-disciplinary review changes the initial assessment in a sizeable minority of cases, particularly in resource-constrained settings. According to consensus recommendations, variability between operators remains a key limitation, with meaningful differences between subgroups.